Open Source
The Geometry of Anisotropic Dilation for Optimal Regularization
arXiv stat.TH0 views
arXiv:2610.09310v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A central question in data-driven inverse problems is how to construct a regularizer that adapts to the geometry of the data distribution. Recent work in optimal regularization shows that, within a broad Gibbs class, the regularizer best matched to a distribution $P$ is determined by a single, direction-dependent radial summary statistic $\rho_P$. This suggests a way to control regularizer geometry by transforming the data. In particular, which transformations act on $\rho_P$ in a simple, explicit way? Can they improve the optimization properties of the resulting variational problems or adapt a fixed base regularizer to data? To address these questions, we introduce anisotropic dilation, a direction-preserving map that rescales each point along its Euclidean ray by a positive profile on the sphere. Despite its simplicity, this family acts transitively on the space of radial summary statistics: any target regularizer in the Gibbs class can be reached from any source distribution by a single explicit profile. We characterize the resulting orbit structure on distributions, derive in closed form the profile that optimally adapts a fixed base regularizer to the data, and show that its improvement over isotropic rescaling is governed by a Jensen gap that is provably positive for several natural families. We also establish finite-sample generalization bounds for jointly learning the base regularizer and anisotropic profile, with explicit rates when the logarithm of the profile is parameterized by linear feature models or sparse ReLU networks. Building on this theory, we parameterize the base regularizer and anisotropic profile and learn them jointly from samples, yielding a data-adaptive regularizer for variational inverse problems. Experiments on a controlled two-dimensional family and MNIST denoising show that learning the profile further improves performance.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09310PreviousWitnessing Quantum Bayesian Inference beyond Classical LearningNextSequential resetting procedures and false discovery rate
Related posts

Karpathy built HackerTube in 2 hours. I rebuilt it in the open and measured it
0dev.to AI
Show HN: Poinky – Claude Code you talk to, that sees your screen
0Hacker News Show
Show HN: DeskAccess – Open-source remote access for Raspberry Pi
0Hacker News Show
Show HN: The Public Eye – Agentic search for congressional bill legibility
0Hacker News Show
NASA’s Perseverance Mars rover breaks historic record after traveling 28 miles
0Science Daily Tech
A fresh wave of cyberattacks has hit Europe’s supermarket refrigerators, destroying food across countries
0TechCrunch